The Big Bang theory describes the origin of our universe. Let's consider:
The basis that all universal energy and particles exploded and expanded at the point of a singularity in a void is the simple explanation of the Big Bang. Plausible? Yes. Fact? Maybe not.
Consider the human perceptual perspective.
Light.
Our visual sense looks at space as a dark empty void, but it is as perceived from the visual perspective. It is tinted by the light ingrained into our perspective, and bleeding into space from our position here ajacent to a star. Space has temperature (very cold), back ground radiation (The COBY Project confirms it), and can be bent by gravity (see Einstein's Relativity) and many more tangible measurements. So it can not be a pure void. It is also a lighter shade of dark.
Consider pure void. The state of total non-existence.
DARK.
Non-existence is as plausable a state as existence is.
I propose that more does not exist than does.
That dark matter and lesser varying degrees of early stage bare existence flooded into this area where we are. Why is dark matter considered to be predominant in our universe? Perspective.
Dark matter is only a lighter shade of dark when non-existence is the perspective.
Our universe and everything in it is just the rough uneven spots being carried along within the greater force of the degrees of dark.
